|
Written by Sarah Cain
Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:55
|
|
"We're finding that about 25 to 30 percent of some cancers stop growing at some point, that can make some treatments look good that aren't doing anything. Until doctors figure out how to identify which patients have cancers that won't progress, the only option is to treat everyone."
— Dr. Otis Brawley, the American Cancer Society's Chief Medical Officer
 |
|
| Are you still walking for the cure? That money you're raising is the reason why they'll never find it. |
|
While researching the use of alternative therapies that were utilized by Suzanne Somers, I came across doctors and media outlets who desperately tried to discourage readers from undertaking similar treatments. Their responses were so hasty that they accidentally revealed figures that are not normally open to the public.
Why aren't these figures ever given to patients who are diagnosed with cancer? Why are they instead told the lie that they will certainly die if they refuse chemotherapy and radiation? I still recall a neighbor who was diagnosed with cancer from when I was a child. He was told that even with chemotherapy, he would only have six months of remaining life. Without chemo, his lifespan was estimated to be weeks. He refused treatment, and he is still healthy today following his 10 years of non-treatment. The couple grew their own organic foods, and engaged in frequent prayer following the diagnosis. His 'treatments' came from a superior physician, in other words.
While most people may consider 25 to 30 percent to be relatively low, this is actually much higher than the success rates for chemotherapy, particularly when you define "cure" as lasting longer than 5 years. The true life-long cure rate bounces between 3 and 4 percent for standard treatments. When compared, 30% becomes an impressive figure. Of course, this number speaks only for those who supposedly do nothing. Alternative therapies get much better life-long cure rates than 30%, but these numbers are not discussed publicly, and rarely in private. Those numbers make all the 'experts' a little too uncomfortable, whenever they actually have them available. Conveniently, none of them seem to know about the 1931 Nobel Prize that was awarded to Dr. Otto Warburg for finding the cause of all cancers, upon which most alternative therapies are based.
We have searched tirelessly for the success rates of those who just decided to walk away from all treatments for several years, but we only found it when the American Cancer Society went on the defense. Why didn't they publicly release those numbers? The recovery of Suzanne Somers was obviously quite embarrassing for them, because not only is she one of many who cured herself of cancer permanently (not just 5 years of "survival"), but she also went public about her experiences with alternative treatments.
The quotation cited earlier makes another interesting point. Doctors have no clue which cancers will progress, and which will not. Therefore, we must ask if early testing is really a good idea. With early testing, not only do the tests actually cause cancers through radiation, cutting, and poisoning, but doctors frequently discover anomalies that would otherwise naturally disappear if left alone. Then they will treat those abnormalities, and the patient will very likely die from the treatments eventually. You see, people usually die from the treatments instead of the cancers. Whenever the human body is exposed to chemotherapy, cancers will strike sooner or later regardless of whether they were there initially. All chemotherapy drugs are carcinogenic, and they weaken all healthy cells by design.
"Two to four percent of cancers respond to chemotherapy."
— Ralph Moss, Ph.D, 1995
Keep walking for that cure, but these numbers are not going to rise much. If you happen to see a rise in orthodox cancer cure rates, then you can be assured that the methods of measuring such cures have changed, not the survival rates. That's how modern medicine works. Surviving for 5 years is actually counted as a cure, but virtually everyone remaining will die between the 5 and 10 year mark. It's called "cooking the books" in accounting circles. We call it murder. Most people are shocked when they hear that those who die during cancer drug studies are dismissed from the outcome, because they didn't "complete the study".
"Success of most chemotherapies is appalling... There is no scientific evidence for its ability to extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancer... Chemotherapy for malignancies too advanced for surgery, which accounts for 80% of all cancers, is a scientific wasteland."
— Dr. Uhlrich Abel
If this were really about science, then nobody would be afraid of the statistics. Truth does not fear investigation. Instead, numbers are repeatedly covered up, and the scientific community eliminates anyone refusing to accept its zealous dogma from its ranks. Whether it be those who embrace Intelligent Design, or those who utilize and study legitimate alternative medicine. The scientific community has become far more interested in politics, money, power and control than the truth, or even science.
"As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."
— Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President of The American Chemical Society
Related Articles
The Cancer Report (documentary)
Cancer Revisited: The Industry Suppressed Budwig Regimen or How To Cure Cancer With Cottage Cheese
Funny, Sad, and Thought Provoking Medical Quotations
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
The Relationship Between Body pH and Disease (and other facts you're not supposed to know)
A New Method of Poisoning Us With Radiation: 'High Efficiency' Light Bulbs
Video: The History Of The Illegal Hoxsey Cancer Cure
Beware of Deodorants, Especially The "Safe" and "All Natural" Ones
Shielding Yourself From Radiation and Dangerous Radioactive Exposure From Cancer Patient Emissions
A Precautionary Notice About Consuming Foods Containing Polyunsaturated Vegetable Oils; Even The Most Righteous Of Them All: Flax Seeds
Toxic Cooking Oils Redux: Lies and Deceptions Of Cooking Oils and Their Labeling
