The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested
| Written by Sarah Cain Thursday, 29 October 2009 12:46 |
  |
Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines; but instead, she unexpectedly turned on her corporate bosses, in a very public way.
When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.
“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all.”
-- Joan Robinson
Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in this country is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any affect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years.
Additionally, there was the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being recommended to, and marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects for Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and that is just for the small percentage of people who went through the hassle of reporting them. So far, 44 girls are officially known to have died, needlessly, from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently -- sometimes causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.
Dr. Harper claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.
“About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.”
-- Dr. Diane Harper
You have to understand how the establishment's word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote. You have to understand their unique version of "science", in other words. When they say that untreated cases "can" lead to something that "may" then lead to cervical cancer, it really means that this relationship is merely a hypothesis perpetuated by the pharmaceutical companies, and that there is no clear relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the related conditions supposedly may cause under specific and uncommon conditions. In the same vein, drinking apple juice may give a person the ability to levitate if it can alter the laws of physics. It's not exactly what we call science. It's F.D.A. science. By the way, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 of a specific venereal disease, so the chance of it helping any individual is about about the same as that person being struck by a meteorite.
Why exactly do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system kills anyway?
Whether her speech will be able to change the current mass vaccination of young girls is so far unknown, but we hope so. These inoculations are little more than hype, with no safety testing for the recommended age group, and having risks that are still being discovered the hard way.
If we had a whistle blower award, Dr. Diane Harper would easily be our winner for 2009. Thank you, Dr. Harper, for doing the right thing. We have hundreds of health care professionals who read this site, and we ask you people to offer Dr. Harper a job. She is probably going to be available sometime soon.
Comments (7)
-
2009-11-16 10:24:39 | Thomas Corriher
That site is well done. We would like a copy of that interview, especially if it is in English.
Are vaccines mandatory there? Some of our vaccinations are called "mandatory", but virtually every State has legal exceptions that parents can use to protect their children from vaccinations. For instance, our State (North Carolina), allows for religious exceptions, so a parent needs to only state that they believe it is unchristian to do that to their child, in order to be protected. Of course, it is the truth. It really is unchristian to do that to a child.
-
2010-08-07 20:47:40 |IP:63.206.47.xxx| Steven
There is a little bit of misinformation in this post. Dr Harper's point is that although the vaccine does help, the incidence of serious side effects may actually be greater than the incidence of cervical cancers (12,000/year in the US). Additionally, there are other avenues to treat and even stop the cancer from even occurring. Hence the point she was making is that deciding whether to vaccinate or not is not an easy call. Note that things would be different if incidence of cervical cancer was greater or if the vaccine was shown to have fewer side effects.
-
2010-08-08 08:53:06 | Thomas Corriher
We agree that the vaccine does more harm to people than good, so where exactly is the misinformation? Moreover, you are suggesting that women are no more valuable than statistics, because it would be okay to harm some of them if only there were a better help-to-harm ratio. That's not okay. It's never okay to knowingly harm people with something (while calling it "medicine"
, even if a larger group of people would be helped. That's what flies for "medical ethics" nowadays, and it is no ethics at all. It's flat-out evil.Real medicine involves treating individuals as human beings whose welfare matters. It's not poising them, and then patting yourself on the back for winning a numbers game. Saying "But it's science!", as you people so love to do, doesn't make it okay either. We've never given any of you people permission to experiment upon us for the sake of your own glory.
I'm giving Steven here a 90% chance of working for the establishment. Steven, I recommend the HonCode websites for you, where you should feel right at home.
The first rule of medicine is supposed to be 'first do no harm'.
-
2010-12-22 04:45:43 | TruthSavesLives
How refreshing, someone in Big Pharm finally grew a conscience. Let's hope & pray more of this will keep happening!
-
2010-12-23 08:57:02 |IP:65.40.120.xxx| Ralph Fucetola - Peitioning the FDA for Redress of Grievances
We've mailed a formal Petition to the FDA regarding holding drug company CEOs responsible for vaccines adverse reactions with regard to the flu vax:
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=7418
In addition to the other formal Petitions we’ve filed before the FDA and FTC, we have prepared and have mailed the Petition, demanding that FDA enforce the law against false vaccine labeling. The Petition makes reference to a 1975 United States Supreme Court doctrine, the Park Doctrine (which arises from a case in which the president of a major corporation, Park, was held responsible for the safety failings of the people he supervised).
This important doctrine would have been effectively repealed in 2010 by the “criminalization of speech about food” bill, S.3067 which did not get added to the food control bill; rejected by Congress… because of mass public PUSH BACK.
-
2011-07-02 13:51:35 |IP:80.202.162.xxx| Mindano Iha
“Replacement” is a normal phenomenon in which virus strains which have been removed by a vaccine are always replaced by new strains. Gardasil is marketed to prevent cancer.
However, the opposite may occur:It is not known by anybody whether the new strains will be more carcinogenic than the ones which have been removed.
In other words, Gardasil may actually increase the risk of cancer.
Powered by Compojoom comment 4.1.5 stable
Hi I'm writing from New Zealand where I looked into Gardasil as we have a daughter. What I uncovered shocked me into setting up a website www.offtheradar.co.nz for other parents and girls to access information health officials won't be telling them.
Dr Diane Harper in a Radio New Zealand interview, back in August 2008, asked our Ministry of Health not to proceed with the "In Schools" vaccination programme here, for the reasons she is continuing to deliver as in your above article. Interestingly our government chose to ignore her credible pleas and chose to go ahead with the Gardasil vaccination of our 12 year old girls.
I have downloaded this interview and will be keeping it safe for when the day comes and the huge fallout from this totally unnecessary vaccine becomes apparent. Our government was forewarned which proves our girls health plays no part in why this vaccine is being pushed onto them.