Doctors Said They Saw An “Excellent Response” To Patrick Swayze's Treatments

Written by Thomas Corriher Friday, 25 September 2009 03:25

An "excellent response" as defined by modern cancer medicine is shown here. You have probably already learned the ultimate conclusion of that response from other media outlets.

Before		After (at age 56)

 

We could not make this stuff up.  Patrick Swayze's doctors actually boasted to the press about this handiwork.  Look up, and ask yourself, if your medicine had this effect on someone, could you possibly boast about it to all the press?  What else did they say?

Dr. George Fisher, Swayze's oncologist, had plenty of proud remarks concerning his work and the type of medicine he practices.

"Because of his excellent response, he will continue the same therapy at Stanford."

How about this nugget from Dr. Fisher?

"Less than 25 percent of patients with pancreatic cancer that has spread survive a year after diagnosis, and yet Swayze is proof that it is possible."

Let's not forget:

"Patrick has a very limited amount of disease and he appears to be responding well to treatment thus far."

The problem (and usual slight-of-hand trick here) is that the death rate soars only after diagnosis and (experimental) "conventional treatments".  It was not the cancer that killed Patrick.  The people who killed him are still patting themselves on the backs and cashing their checks.

It is also worth nothing that the most common reason for cancers to "spread" is conventional chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation -- the very "treatments" themselves spread it, in other words.  Swayze would have almost certainly lived longer, and much better, if he had treated his cancer with 3 packs of cigarettes a day instead.

As a general rule, untreated patients live better, and live longer, than those who are given "conventional medicine".  Of course, the results are even better with alternative (non-poisonous) remedies -- the ones that actually work to permanently cure in more than 4% of the cancer cases.  Guess which type of medicine can boast of a 4% permanent cure rate?

Swayze made the common mistake of seeking "treatments" from allopathic doctors, when he should have been seeking cures from alternative medicine practitioners.  Ultimately, Swayze made a leap of faith -- or more aptly -- a leap of very misguided faith.  He paid dearly for his mistake, and millions of people will follow him; all the way to the grave.  Many people are now saying "rest in peace", but for people like us, it has become practically irresistible to avoid saying, "we told you so".